Codecov Report

Merging #4941 (9080e12) into develop (97f2a09) will decrease coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 30.30%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4941      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    92.63%   92.50%   -0.14%     
===========================================
  Files          196      196              
  Lines        15899    15926      +27     
===========================================
+ Hits         14728    14732       +4     
- Misses        1171     1194      +23     

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 97f2a09...9080e12. Read the comment docs.

Would love to see this merged!

How can we get this feature merged, please?

Can someone help review this PR please?

Would love to see this!

Would really like to see this feature going live.
Are there any updates on this? 🤔

Codecov Report

Merging #4941 (b616a94) into develop (cab1b4d) will decrease coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 30.30%.

❗ Current head b616a94 differs from pull request most recent head 71f5624. Consider uploading reports for the commit 71f5624 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4941      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    92.63%   92.50%   -0.14%     
===========================================
  Files          203      203              
  Lines        16129    16156      +27     
===========================================
+ Hits         14941    14945       +4     
- Misses        1188     1211      +23     

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cab1b4d...71f5624. Read the comment docs.

Almost there, would love to see that to !

@TobiasDummschat last review in July was just about a duplicate title. Does that mean you could give a LGTM now and merge this?

This would be nice to get in!

@stealthycoin @TobiasDummschat It's been a while. Can help re-review?

Hi all - I wanted to provide an update here. This was recently brought up to team discussion and we'll need to do further investigation on this. Though we can't share a definite timeline, we now have a backlog item for the team and will post further updates here. In the meantime, I'm going to convert this to draft.

it's a 4 year old PR, with an "update" from a year ago. For what seems to be a simple feature and a very coherent addition to make ls and cp commands work in similar ways. Still nothing?